Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 00912
Original file (PD 2013 00912.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX     CASE: PD-2013-00912
BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCE     BOARD DATE: 20140204
SEPARATION DATE: 20011105


SUMMARY OF CASE: Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was an active duty SRA/E-4 (2W/Munitions System) medically separated for diabetes mellitus (DM). The condition could not be adequately rehabilitated to meet the physical requirements of her Air Force Specialty or satisfy physical fitness standards. She was issued a permanent P4 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The DM condition was found “medically unacceptable” and was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AFI 48-123. No other conditions were submitted by the MEB. The PEB adjudicated “diabetes mellitus” as unfitting and rated it 20%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The CI made no appeals and was medically separated.


CI CONTENTION: “Diabetes is very difficult to manage, affects mood and general health daily; illness and stress affect management seriously and complications are inevitable. In addition, patients with one organ-specific autoimmune disease and the presence of thyroid dysfunction may affect diabetes control. (from Thyroid Disease and Diabetes, XXXXXX, http://journal.diabetes.org) I was recently put on thyroid medication and have symptoms of thyroid problems, in joint pains, menstrual problems, evidence of infertility family history, anxiety and depression, and fatigue. The nature of both autoimmune disorders indicate that these problems will only get worse and need more medication and attention.”


SCOPE OF REVIEW: The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. The rating for the unfitting diabetes condition is addressed below. No other conditions are within the DoDI 6040.44 defined purview of the Board. Any condition outside the Board’s defined scope of review may be eligible for consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.


RATING COMPARISON :

Service PEB – dated 20010727
 VA – Service Treatment Record (STR)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Diabetes Mellitus 7913 20% Diabetes Mellitus, Type I 7913 20% STR
No Additional MEB/PEB Entries
 Other x 5
Combined: 20%
 Combined: 40%
Derived from VA Rating Decision (VA RD ) dated 200 70505 ( most proximate to date of separation [ DOS ] )


ANALYSIS SUMMARY: The Board acknowledges the sentiment expressed by the CI regarding the impairment with which her conditions continue to burden her and the significant impact they have had on her quality of life. It is noted for the record that the Board is subject to the same laws for disability entitlements as those under which the Disability Evaluation System (DES) operates. The DES has neither the role nor the authority to compensate members for future severity or potential complications of conditions. That role and authority is granted to the Department of Veterans Affairs. The Board evaluates VA evidence in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness and rating determinations at the time of separation. While the DES considers all of the CI's medical conditions, compensation can only be offered for those conditions that cut short a member’s career, and then only to the degree of severity present at the time of separation. The VA, however, is empowered to compensate for service-connected conditions and to periodically re-evaluate conditions for the purpose of adjusting the Veteran’s disability rating should the degree of impairment change over time.

Diabetes Mellitus (DM). In November 2000, the CI developed symptoms of polyuria (increased urination), polydipsia (increased thirst) and weight loss. She was admitted to the hospital and was diagnosed with DM. Initially she was treated with oral hypoglycemic medications, but was later switched to insulin. In 2001, the CI underwent MEB and PEB. The MEB narrative summary dictated on 10 July 2001, noted that her physical examination was normal and blood pressure was 120/72. A laboratory evaluation had shown that hemoglobin A1C (HgbA1C) was 10%. Her treatment plan included insulin and restricted diet. There was no mention of medically prescribed regulation of activities. As noted above, the CI was separated in November 2001 with a 20% service disability rating.

The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. The PEB and VA both chose the same coding and rating options for the DM condition. IAW VASRD §4.119, a rating of 20% is appropriate for DM requiring insulin and restricted diet. A higher rating of 40% would require medically prescribed regulation of activities. Regulation of activities is when a licensed healthcare provider prescribes or recommends that a diabetic patient avoid strenuous occupational or recreational activities. In the CI’s treatment record, there was not sufficient evidence that this was the case. After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB adjudication for the diabetes condition.
BOARD FINDINGS: IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. The Board did not surmise from the record or PEB ruling in this case that any prerogatives outside the VASRD were exercised. In the matter of the DM condition and IAW VASRD §4.119, the Board unanimously recommends no change in the PEB adjudication. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.


 RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separat ion determination, as follows:

UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING
Diabetes Mellitus 7913 20%
COMBINED 20%



The following documentary evidence was considered:

Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20130624, w/atchs
Exhibit B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record








                 
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAF/MRB
Dear XXXXXXXXXXXXXX:

         Reference your application submitted under the provisions of DoDI 6040.44 (Title 10 U.S.C. §  1554a), PDBR Case Number PD-2013-00912.

         After careful consideration of your application and treatment records, the Physical Disability Board of Review determined that the rating assigned at the time of final disposition of your disability evaluation system processing was appropriate. Accordingly, the Board recommended no re-characterization or modification of your separation.

         I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board. I concur with that finding and their conclusion that re-characterization of your separation is not warranted. Accordingly, I accept their recommendation that your application be denied.

                                                               Sincerely,





 XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Director
Air Force Review Boards Agency
Attachment:
Record of Proceedings

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01175

    Original file (PD 2013 01175.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGSPHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEWNAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXX CASE: PD-2013-01175BRANCH OF SERVICE: AIR FORCEBOARD DATE: 20140326 SEPARATION DATE: 20050912 I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00974

    Original file (PD 2012 00974.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board evaluates DVA evidence in arriving at its recommendations, but its authority resides in evaluating the fairness of DES fitness and rating determinations at the time of separation. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Diabetes Mellitus 7913 20% COMBINED 20% The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 294,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-00222

    Original file (PD2012-00222.docx) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board could not consider the DM renal insufficiency separately as it was not in the PEBs final rating recommendation. The medical evidence of the anemia condition was discussed under the DM condition for possible consideration with a higher rating under the 7913 DM code. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the PEB fitness determination for the anemia condition and,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01132

    Original file (PD-2013-01132.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Any conditions outside the Board’s scope of review may be eligible for consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records. It is appropriately coded 7913, and IAW VASRD §4.119, meets criteria for the 60% rating level due to requiring insulin, restricted diet, and regulation of activities; with an episode of ketoacidosis, which required hospitalization, plus complications that would not be compensable if separately evaluated. In the CI’s treatment record, there was not sufficient...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00956

    Original file (PD 2012 00956.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    In May 2000, he underwent an MEB and was found fit for duty. The PEB and VA both used VASRD code 7913 for the DM condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: UNFITTING CONDITION VASRD CODE RATING Diabetes mellitus, type 2 7913 20% COMBINED 20% The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120608, w/atchs Exhibit B.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012-01573

    Original file (PD2012-01573.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) adjudicated the DM Type I condition as unfitting, rated 20%, with application of the Veteran’s Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Both the MEB and PEB physician examiners recommended that the CI have no restriction of physical activities. Service Treatment Record Exhibit C. Department of Veterans’ Affairs Treatment Record XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX, DAF Acting Director Physical Disability Board of Review SFMR-RB MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01207

    Original file (PD2012 01207.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “diabetes mellitus type 1”as unfitting, rated 20%, with likely application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD).The remaining conditions were determined to be not unfitting.The CI did not agree with the PEB findings but did request a formal hearing or submit an appeal, so his case was sent to the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA). This condition was indeed “not unfitting” at the time of separation.The Board therefore concluded that this condition...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD-2014-01778

    Original file (PD-2014-01778.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20051012 The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2014 | PD 2014 01466

    Original file (PD 2014 01466.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    SEPARATION DATE: 20090426 The CI was still taking oral medications only (no injected insulin) and had undergone surgery in March 2008 (Abdominoplasty) with continued high blood sugar levels (glucose 262 with normal 74-106) and high Glycosolated hemoglobin levels (A1C 9.5 with normal 4.2-7.0). I have carefully reviewed the evidence of record and the recommendation of the Board.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD-2012-00911

    Original file (PD-2012-00911.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The MEB forwarded diabetes mellitus type I, requiring Insulin to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB). Diabetes Mellitus Requiring Insulin Condition. RECOMMENDATION: The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows: VASRD CODE RATING 7913 COMBINED 20% 20% Diabetes Mellitus Requiring Insulin UNFITTING CONDITION The following documentary evidence was considered: Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20120606,...